<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>x-feeds — the daily AI meta</title><description>One pick per day: what AI Twitter was actually talking about.</description><link>https://x-feeds.pages.dev/</link><item><title>Claude Opus 4.6 plummets on BridgeBench after retest — hallucination rate nearly doubles and lab rivalry ignites</title><link>https://x-feeds.pages.dev/2026-04-13/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://x-feeds.pages.dev/2026-04-13/</guid><description>CLAUDE OPUS 4.6 IS NERFED.

BridgeBench just proved it.

Last week Claude Opus 4.6 ranked #2 on the Hallucination benchmark with an accuracy of 83.3%.

Today Claude Opus 4.6 was retested and it fell to #10 on the leaderboard with an accuracy of only 68.3%.

A 98% increase in hallucination.

— @bridgemindai</description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>